Latest Guides

Community News

Court-Ordered Appeal to Come Before Board of Zoning Appeals This Week

Published on Tuesday, June 15, 2021 | 5:30 pm
 
141 S Lake Avenue Pasadena. Credit: Google Maps

The Board of Zoning Appeals will hear a rare court-ordered appeal at 6:30 p.m. Thursday,

In April, Pasadena Now reported that a Superior Court judge ruled the city must allow a developer to appeal a ruling on a project that was denied by the city after the developer attempted to use a concession to get around a law that restricts converting commercial buildings to housing on portions of Lake Avenue.

The controversy began when DC Properties proposed a 70-unit all-market rate mixed-use project at 141 S. Lake Ave. According to attorney Richard McDonald, who represents DC Properties, the city refused to process an affordable housing concession permit on the grounds that housing cannot occupy more than 50% of the total floor area of the building on South Lake Avenue.

The project was changed to an 87-unit density bonus project, including six very-low-income units, and 10,000 square feet of commercial space on the ground floor.

Under terms of that plan, the developer received two concessions under state law that grants bonuses if developers add more than the required number of lower-income housing units.

However, the developer attempted to use a concession for an exemption to the housing rule.

According to city officials, concessions could only be used for development standards, including building height, and then denied a request for an appeal on the project.

At the March 19 hearing, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Mitchell Beckloff did not rule on the zoning issue that led to the case being filed, but instead found fault with the city’s refusal to allow an appeal.

“The city concedes the zoning administrator’s letter of September 26, 2019 sets forth two decisions. First, under the clear terms of the Municipal Code, an application for concession is not available when the applicant is trying to change the use of the piece of property. Second, since the application for use concession was simply unavailable, there was no appealable decision on the application,” Becklofff wrote.

“It is curious to the court that despite the city’s decision on Sept. 26, 2019, the city contends petitioner has no remedy for those decisions when he contends the city erred. That is, there can be no appeal where the city has declared the decision as final — case closed,” the judge wrote.

According to the judge, the city’s refusal to hear an appeal did not comply with the city’s municipal code, which states, “an appeal can be filed by any person affected by a determination, decision, action rendered by the Director, Hearing Officer, Board of Zoning Appeals, Environmental Administration, Design Commission, Arts and Culture Commission, Historic Preservation Commission, Advisory Agency or Commission.”

“There is no basis for the City’s interpretation of the Code or the SDB (State Density Bonus Law) under the express language of either, or California law,” wrote McDonald. “Accordingly, we ask you to reverse the BZA’s September 26, 2019 determination and require the concession be processed in accordance with the mandates of the SDBL.”

In May, McDonald told Pasadena Now that his client has a “big disagreement with the city over the applicability of the state density bonus law and the interpretation of the local code on mixed-use projects along South Lake Avenue. The city contends that certain restrictions on the project are not subject to the state density bonus law, and we contend that they are.”

The project would have included 10,000 square feet of commercial space on the ground floor.

Get our daily Pasadena newspaper in your email box. Free.

Get all the latest Pasadena news, more than 10 fresh stories daily, 7 days a week at 7 a.m.

Make a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

 

 

 

buy ivermectin online
buy modafinil online
buy clomid online
buy ivermectin online