Latest Guides

Community News

Former Baby Depicted on Iconic Nirvana Album Cover Photographed in Pasadena Pool Sues Band for Child Porn

Published on Wednesday, August 25, 2021 | 5:43 am
 

The 30-year-old man pictured as a naked baby swimming in a Pasadena pool on the cover of the multimillion-selling Nirvana album “Nevermind” filed suit Tuesday in Los Angeles, alleging the former members of the grunge-rock trio, various record companies, art directors and others violated federal criminal child pornography laws and caused him lifelong suffering by “trafficking” his image worldwide.

Spencer Elden, of Los Angeles, alleges that his “identity and legal name are forever tied to the commercial sexual exploitation he experienced as a minor which has been distributed and sold worldwide from the time he was a baby to the present day,” according to the complaint filed in Los Angeles federal court.

Messages seeking comment sent to the Universal Music Group and an attorney who represents Nirvana LLC were not immediately answered.

According to the suit, the defendants “knowingly produced, possessed, and advertised commercial child pornography depicting Spencer, and they knowingly received value in exchange for doing so. … Despite this knowledge, defendants failed to take reasonable steps to protect Spencer and prevent his widespread sexual exploitation and image trafficking.”

Elden’s parents never signed a release authorizing the use of the photos taken of the four-month-old baby in a Pasadena aquatic center in 1990 and Elden received no compensation, lawyers for the plaintiff allege.

The cover of “Nevermind” — released in 1991 by the Geffen/UMG label — depicts a naked baby swimming underwater, seemingly towards a fish hook with a dollar bill attached. It is among the best-known album covers in rock.

“To ensure the album cover would trigger a visceral sexual response from the viewer, (photographer Kirk) Weddle activated Spencer’s `gag reflex’ before throwing him underwater in poses highlighting and emphasizing Spencer’s exposed genitals,” the suit alleges.

The lawsuit contends that the album cover photo chosen by Nirvana’s late leader Kurt Cobain suggests a “sex worker grabbing for a dollar bill.”

Elden’s suit alleges the defendants “used child pornography depicting Spencer as an essential element of a record promotion scheme commonly utilized in the music industry to get attention, wherein album covers posed children in a sexually provocative manner to gain notoriety, drive sales, and garner media attention, and critical reviews.”

As a result, Elden “has suffered and will continue to suffer lifelong damages,” according to the complaint.

The suit seeks either $150,000 from each of the 17 defendants or unspecified damages to be determined at trial.

Geffen Records originally shipped 46,521 copies of “Nevermind” to retailers in hopes of eventually selling 200,000 copies. The album, a cornerstone of the grunge era, eventually sold over 30 million copies, is often noted for helping bring punk to the mainstream.

Get our daily Pasadena newspaper in your email box. Free.

Get all the latest Pasadena news, more than 10 fresh stories daily, 7 days a week at 7 a.m.

Make a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 thoughts on “Former Baby Depicted on Iconic Nirvana Album Cover Photographed in Pasadena Pool Sues Band for Child Porn

  • Somebody really wants recognition and money. Makes me laugh to think anyone would look at this and think child pornography. Sad the lengths some people go to.

  • People are saying he’s money hungry or bashing him for complaining but 1. He got no compensation for the photo of HIM that they used to sell literal millions of copies so his requests for compensation aren’t even close to being unreasonable and 2. He’s right that is literally a photo of a child’s exposed genitalia, I mean now a days we don’t even post baby bathtub pictures because we as a society have grown to realize that there are perverts in this world who can and will get off to something as simple as a baby’s genitals, but if you frame it as “artistic expression” then suddenly that’s a get out of jail free card (metaphorically and literally) we can’t pick and choose what photos videos media of naked children is CP and which isn’t if the child is exposed like that and captured with the intent to sell/distribute that’s CP.

 

 

 

 

buy ivermectin online
buy modafinil online
buy clomid online
buy ivermectin online