Pasadena’s Harvest Rock Church Holds Indoor Church Service After U.S. Supreme Court Gives Nod

Pasadena’s Harvest Rock Church held an indoor church service Sunday, two days after winning a legal victory from the U.S. Supreme Court, which granted a partial injunction against California’s coronavirus-related prohibition against indoor worship services.

“It’s not just our First Amendment rights but our biblical mandate (to worship in person),” senior pastor Che Ahn told Sunday’s congregation.

“You could (worship) virtually, I guess, but that’s not relational,

it’s not personal. … We believe you’re adults, you’re responsible. We believe in freedom. We wouldn’t be suing the governor if we didn’t believe in freedom.”

On a 6-3 vote late Friday, the Supreme Court cited the Constitution’s protection of the free exercise of religion and ruled that “regulations like these violate the First Amendment unless the State can show they are the least restrictive means of achieving a compelling government interest.”

Although Ahn celebrated as if the church had won a total victory, it was not that. The ruling allowed state restrictions on crowd size — 25% of capacity — with prohibitions against singing and chanting remaining in place.

The church met illegally indoors when the health order was in place. It is not known if they will comply with the ruling limiting the crowd to 25% capacity. 

Ahn said Harvest Rock was not finished with its legal challenges and would contest the ban on singing. He mentioned that singing was still legal in other settings, including on Hollywood film and TV sets.

“Fifty percent of our worship is singing, and we’re going to sing no matter what,” Ahn said.

The pastor also encouraged parishioners to sign a recall petition against Gov. Gavin Newsom.

In accordance with the court’s ruling, Newsom’s office issued a revised public health order for indoor church services on Saturday.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that federal courts owe “significant deference” to politically accountable officials in public health matters, but said that deference has its limits.

“The state’s present determination — that the maximum number of adherents who can safely worship in the most cavernous cathedral is zero — appears to reflect not expertise or discretion, but instead insufficient appreciation or consideration of the interests at stake,” Roberts wrote.

The ruling did not reverse the 25% capacity restriction or a prohibition on singing and chanting.

“The state has concluded, for example, that singing indoors poses a heightened risk of transmitting Covid-19,” Roberts wrote. “I see no basis in this record for overriding that aspect of the state public health framework.”

The decision reflected the court’s current ideological divide with six conservative justices in favor of the partial injunction and the three liberals dissenting.

“Justices of this court are not scientists,” Associate Justice Elena Kagan wrote in dissent to the majority ruling. “Nor do we know much about public health policy. Yet today the court displaces the judgments of experts about how to respond to a raging pandemic.”

The ruling was the latest in a series of high-profile emergency requests to the nation’s highest court seeking guidance on the question of whether health orders aimed at containing COVID-19 apply to churches and other houses of worship.

Harvest Rock urged parishioners who planned to attend in person Sunday and in the future to follow health protocols on social distancing and sanitation.